What’s wrong with this photo? (Arborist safety)

Can you spot 6 dangerous work habits in this photo challenge from WorkSafe Magazine?

Can you spot 6 dangerous work habits in this photo challenge from WorkSafe Magazine?

The Jan/Feb 2012 issue of WorkSafe Magazine features a landscaping scenario in its popular photo challenge, “What’s Wrong With This Photo?”

The staged photo includes at least six hazardous work habits (possibly many more), and your challenge is to identify them and submit your answers to WorkSafe Magazine by January 30, 2012. Your response may be printed in the next bimonthly issue and your name will be put into a draw for a small prize. You can even play online.

Speaking of arborists, I saw an unusual tree incident recently in my neighbourhood. The tree was deemed dangerous because a water pipe had broken beneath its roots, creating potential for it to topple.

Arborist falls tree that needs emergency removal because a major water pipe broke under its roots, S.Main photo

Arborist falls tree that needs emergency removal because a major water pipe broke under its roots, S.Main photo

Arborists showed up and climbed the 60-foot tree in beside a townhouse complex and a busy street, with lots of electrical wires above. School children and passers-by stood outside the cordoned-off safety area and watched one of them climb the tree and slice off its branches with a small saw held in the air by ropes.

The worker wore fall protection, eye protection, and other PPE described in the WorkSafeBC publication Working Safety Around Electricity.

What I saw that day looked like a safe operation, unlike the dangerous situation staged in “What’s Wrong With This Photo?” – which you can visit online and try now.

Good luck!

Share

One thought on “What’s wrong with this photo? (Arborist safety)

  1. Nicole

    I really love their photo hunt challenges, but I think I learn the most when I see their answer sheet and what others have submitted. I don’t know much about what arborists do, but I think their set-up photo has many more hazardous points than I found! Thanks for sharing. 🙂

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *